WELL · 42-237-38432 · DISTRICT 9

Durham W. J. A #5

Y

Jack County · Jupiter (Conglomerate Upper) field · Temp Abandoned  · Vertical

Durham W. J. A #5 (API 42-237-38432) is a well in Jack County operated by Jay Management Company LLC, completed January 11, 1999 and listed as temp abandoned on the RRC schedule.

The RRC has issued one drilling permit, issued December 16, 1998, permitted to 5,999 ft.

It was permitted by Akers & Fultz, Inc. and has since transferred to Jay Management Company LLC on the wellbore schedule.

Completion filings report 4 formation tops, including Caddo, Jupiter Conglomerate Upper, Jupiter Conglomerate 3rd, Cundiff S. Conglomerate.

No lease production has been reported under this well’s leases.

Operator of record

Jay Management Company LLC

Permitted by Akers & Fultz, Inc.; the EWA schedule now lists a different operator.

Houston, TX · P-5 Y, filed Nov 4, 2025 · 26 permits on file · (713) 417-6530

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore scheduleJay Management Company LLC
Production reportsJay Management Company, LLCthrough May 2024
Latest permitAkers & Fultz, Inc.Dec 16, 1998

The sources disagree, which usually means a transfer or a lease-level production filing by a different entity. Petrora goes with the schedule.

5,999
total depth, ft
1
permits on file
Dec 16, 1998
last permit issued
Jan 11, 1999
completed
0
cumulative oil, bbl
87.6K
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS · Jan 1999 THROUGH Jul 2026

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
ON SCHEDULE
Completed
Jan 11, 1999
Shut in
—
Plugged
—

Operator's P-5 on the schedule: Active

Surface location

No coordinates on the permit record yet. The RRC's GIS record usually lands within days of issuance; historical master-file permits never carry one.

Lease production

PDQ LEASE REPORTS · REPORTED THROUGH APR 2026

Texas reports oil by lease, not by well. These are the lease this well is completed on; this well is the only one on it.Why →

LeaseFieldReporting operatorWellsOil, bblGas, mcfReported
Durham, W. J. "A" G-13-171961Jupiter (Conglomerate Upper)Jay Management Company, LLC1087.6KJan 1999 – Jul 2026

Gas, mcf lease total

Last 12 months 0 · prior 12 16(-100%)

0200400600202420252026

Chain of custody

Every operator that reported production on this well's lease, in order.

  1. 1Akers & Fultz, Inc.Feb 1999 → Mar 2000
  2. 2Gruy Petroleum Management Co.Apr 2000 → Jan 2001
  3. 3Enlo Energy Co., Ltd.Feb 2001 → Dec 2001
  4. 4Four Sevens Operating Co., Ltd.Jan 2002 → Sep 2003
  5. 5Aspen Operating Company, L.L.C.Oct 2003 → Jan 2008
  6. 6Jay Management Company, LLCFeb 2008 → May 2024

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
481560-99DrillAkers & Fultz, Inc.Dec 16, 1998Dec 16, 1998Dec 16, 19985,999

Completions

CompletedLeaseFieldOperatorStatusDepth
—— G-13-171961————

Formation tops

As filed on W-2/G-1. Subsea from 1,007 ft elevation.Download CSV →

FormationMD ftSubsea
CaddoCADDO LIME4,944-3,937
Jupiter Conglomerate Upper5,205-4,198
Jupiter Conglomerate 3RD5,452-4,445
Cundiff S. Conglomerate5,596-4,589

Perforations

Perforated and open-hole intervals.

FromToType
5,2055,210Perforated
5,2255,233Perforated

Casing

Strings as reported, shallowest first.

Casing inSet atHole inCement
8.62531412.25194 S
4.55,6997.875190 S

Completion filings

W-2 and G-1 reports on record in the RRC wellbore file, newest first. The suffix identifies the wellbore or completion event. About these reports →

SuffixFiledW-2 / G-1 dateLogs referenced
00Mar 16, 1999Feb 16, 1999Yes
00Mar 3, 1999——

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/23738432, documented in the API reference.