WELL · 42-247-31610 · DISTRICT 4
Mestena Oil & Gas #E9
Jim Hogg County · Mestena Grande (Queen City Cons) field · Vertical
Mestena Oil & Gas #E9 (API 42-247-31610) is a plugged well in Jim Hogg County, plugged November 7, 2012, last operated by Cody Energy LLC.
The RRC has issued one drilling permit, issued September 17, 1984, permitted to 10,000 ft.
It was permitted by Enstar Petroleum Company and has since transferred to Cody Energy LLC on the wellbore schedule.
Completion filings report 2 formation tops, including Pettus, Queen City.
Operator of record
Permitted by Enstar Petroleum Company; the EWA schedule now lists a different operator.
Houston, TX · P-5 Y, filed Oct 2, 2020 · 216 permits on file · (800) 767-9015
SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE
What each RRC source says
| Wellbore schedule | Cody Energy LLC |
| Production reports | Cody Energy LLCthrough Dec 2008 |
| Latest permit | Enstar Petroleum CompanySep 17, 1984 |
The sources disagree, which usually means a transfer or a lease-level production filing by a different entity. Petrora goes with the schedule.
- 10,000
- total depth, ft
- 1
- permits on file
- Sep 17, 1984
- last permit issued
- Oct 22, 1984
- completed
- 0
- cumulative oil, bbl
- 180K
- cumulative gas, mcf
PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS · Jan 1993 THROUGH Nov 2012
Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file
- Schedule
- OFF SCHEDULE
- Completed
- Oct 22, 1984
- Shut in
- —
- Plugged
- Nov 7, 2012
Surface location
No coordinates on the permit record yet. The RRC's GIS record usually lands within days of issuance; historical master-file permits never carry one.
Lease production
PDQ LEASE REPORTS · REPORTED THROUGH APR 2026
Texas reports oil by lease, not by well. These are the lease this well is completed on; this well is the only one on it.Why →
| Lease | Field | Reporting operator | Wells | Oil, bbl | Gas, mcf | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mestena Oil & Gas G-4-114987 | Mestena Grande (Queen City Cons) | Cody Energy LLC | 1 | 0 | 180K | Jan 1993 – Nov 2012 |
No volumes reported on these leases in the last three years.
Chain of custody
Every operator that reported production on this well's lease, in order.
- 1Williams-Cody, Inc.Jan 1993 → Apr 1993
- 2Cody Energy, Inc.May 1993 → Jan 1999
- 3Cody Energy LLCFeb 1999 → Dec 2008
Permits
| Permit | Type | Operator | Received | Issued | Spud | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 251566-99 | Drill | Enstar Petroleum Company | Sep 17, 1984 | Sep 17, 1984 | Sep 19, 1984 | 10,000 |
Completions
| Completed | Lease | Field | Operator | Status | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — G-4-114987 | — | — | — | — |
Formation tops
As filed on W-2/G-1. Subsea from 462 ft elevation.Download CSV →
| Formation | MD ft | Subsea |
|---|---|---|
| Pettus | 5,529 | -5,067 |
| Queen City | 9,624 | -9,162 |
Perforations
Perforated and open-hole intervals.
| From | To | Type |
|---|---|---|
| 9,652 | 9,685 | Perforated |
Casing
Strings as reported, shallowest first.
| Casing in | Set at | Hole in | Cement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.75 | 628 | 14.75 | 355 S |
| 7 | 6,522 | 9.875 | 1,390 S |
| 5 | 9,946 | 6.125 | 500 S |
Completion filings
W-2 and G-1 reports on record in the RRC wellbore file, newest first. The suffix identifies the wellbore or completion event. About these reports →
| Suffix | Filed | W-2 / G-1 date | Logs referenced |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00 | Mar 4, 1985 | Feb 20, 1985 | — |
| 00 | Feb 28, 1985 | Feb 1, 1985 | — |
The source documents
Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.
- Wellbore filings for 42-247-31610 → W-2, G-1, plugging reports, as PDFs
- Completion packets for 42-247-31610 → scanned completion filings
Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.
About this data
Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.
New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease
Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/24731610, documented in the API reference.