WELL · 42-249-00925 · DISTRICT 5

Little Rose Unit #2

Plugged

Jim Wells County · Little Rose (Pundt Sand) field  · Vertical

Little Rose Unit #2 (API 42-249-00925) is a plugged well in Jim Wells County, plugged August 3, 1966, last operated by The Marks Company.

The RRC has issued one drilling permit, issued October 29, 2019, permitted to 5,133 ft.

It was permitted by Petroleum Recovery Systems, L.C. and has since transferred to The Marks Company on the wellbore schedule.

Operator of record

The Marks Company

Permitted by Petroleum Recovery Systems, L.C.; the EWA schedule now lists a different operator.

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore schedulenone
Production reportsnone
Latest permitPetroleum Recovery Systems, L.C.Oct 29, 2019

The sources disagree, which usually means a transfer or a lease-level production filing by a different entity. Petrora goes with the schedule.

5,133
total depth, ft
1
permits on file
Oct 29, 2019
last permit issued
—
completed
—
cumulative oil, bbl
—
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
OFF SCHEDULE
Completed
—
Shut in
—
Plugged
Aug 3, 1966

Surface location

27.838245, -97.979657

OpenStreetMap → ·  Google Maps →

Permit surface location from the RRC GIS record, in Jim Wells County.

Only the permit record exists for this well so far, here and in the RRC's wellbore query. Completion reports, formation tops, lease production, and the scanned filings appear once the operator files a completion report, typically months after drilling. Petrora refreshes the wellbore file weekly, so a filing from the last few days may reach the RRC before it shows here. How long each source takes →

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
857631-99ReenterPetroleum Recovery Systems, L.C.Oct 2, 2019Oct 29, 2019—5,133

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

Nearby wells and their tops

NEAREST 8 LOCATED WELLS WITH TOPS · WITHIN 16 KM

Draw a cross-section

This well has no tops filed, so it cannot anchor a section; its neighbours can.

Section of the neighbours →

Rosita Creek A42-249-32680

2.8 KM · Cimarron Engineering, LLC · Section with this well →

Miocene (undifferentiated)1,610-1,472
Catahoula3,292-3,154
Catahoula3,982-3,844
Vicksburg6,022-5,884
Jackson—
Yegua—

Rosita Creek42-249-32675

3.2 KM · Cimarron Engineering, LLC · Section with this well →

Miocene (undifferentiated)1,592-1,443
Catahoula3,320-3,171
Catahoula4,010-3,861
Vicksburg6,026-5,877
Yegua—
Jackson—

W.D. Fowler42-249-32615

4.0 KM · Harper Hefte, Inc. · Section with this well →

Miocene (undifferentiated)1,800-1,647
Catahoula2,420-2,267
Catahoula3,610-3,457
Vicksburg5,670-5,517
Jackson—
Yegua—

Vanover42-249-32665

4.6 KM · Cimarron Engineering, LLC · Section with this well →

Miocene (undifferentiated)1,340-1,148
Catahoula1,824-1,632
Catahoula2,230-2,038
Vicksburg4,992-4,800
Yegua—
Jackson—

Chippo42-249-32686

6.1 KM · Cimarron Engineering, LLC · Section with this well →

Miocene (undifferentiated)1,450-1,293
Catahoula2,922-2,765
Catahoula3,978-3,821
Vicksburg5,648-5,491
Yegua—
Jackson—

Mosser42-249-32666

6.2 KM · Cimarron Engineering, LLC · Section with this well →

Miocene (undifferentiated)1,945-1,811
Catahoula3,088-2,954
Catahoula5,112-4,978
Vicksburg5,603-5,469
Jackson5,694-5,560
Yegua—

Mike Garcia42-249-32673

7.0 KM · Paloma Operating, LLC · Section with this well →

Miocene (undifferentiated)1,300-1,096
Catahoula2,960-2,756
Catahoula3,600-3,396
Yegua—
Vicksburg—
Jackson—

Suzanne Bell42-249-32661

7.4 KM · Modern Exploration, Inc. · Section with this well →

Miocene (undifferentiated)1,100-957
Catahoula2,100-1,957
Catahoula2,800-2,657
Vicksburg5,500-5,357
Jackson5,700-5,557
Yegua—

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/24900925, documented in the API reference.