WELL · 42-315-30914 · DISTRICT 6

Cromer #9

N

Marion County  · Vertical

Cromer #9 (API 42-315-30914) is a permitted well in Marion County filed by Xto Energy Inc.; no completion report is on file yet.

The RRC has issued 2 drilling permits (amended once) between 2005 and 2009, permitted to 8,800 ft.

Completion filings report 3 formation tops, including Pettit, Travis Peak, Cotton Valley.

Its 3 leases have reported 12.8K barrels of oil and 309K mcf of gas since June 2005, last reporting in July 2026. The leases carry 3 wells, so these are lease totals, not this well alone.

Operator of record

XTO Energy Inc.

Spring, TX · P-5 Y, filed Feb 4, 2026 · 16,156 permits on file · (832) 625-1100

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore schedulenone
Production reportsFaulconer Energy, LLCthrough Apr 2026
Latest permitXTO Energy Inc.Aug 13, 2009
8,800
total depth, ft
3
permits on file
Aug 13, 2009
last permit issued
—
completed
12.8K
cumulative oil, bbl
309K
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS · Jun 2005 THROUGH Jul 2026

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
OFF SCHEDULE
Completed
—
Shut in
—
Plugged
—

Surface location

No coordinates on the permit record yet. The RRC's GIS record usually lands within days of issuance; historical master-file permits never carry one.

Lease production

PDQ LEASE REPORTS · REPORTED THROUGH APR 2026

Texas reports oil by lease, not by well. These are the 3 leases this well is completed on; they carry 3 wells in total, so volumes are shared.Why →

LeaseFieldReporting operatorWellsOil, bblGas, mcfReported
Cromer O-6-14670Rodessa (Cotton Valley Cons.)Faulconer Energy, LLC18.6K38.1KJun 2007 – Jul 2026
Cromer G-6-217384Rodessa (Cotton Valley Cons.)Nadel and Gussman, L.L.C.1060.6KJun 2006 – Sep 2007
Cromer O-6-14430Rodessa (Cotton Valley Cons.)Nadel and Gussman, L.L.C.14.19K211KJun 2005 – Dec 2006

Gas, mcf lease total

Last 12 months 52 · prior 12 288(-82%)

0200400202420252026

Oil, barrels lease total

Last 12 months 21 · prior 12 11(+91%)

0102030202420252026

Chain of custody

Every operator that reported production on this well's lease, in order.

  1. 1Nadel and Gussman, L.L.C.Jun 2005 → Dec 2007
  2. 2XTO Energy Inc.Jan 2008 → Feb 2023
  3. 3Faulconer Energy, LLCJul 2023 → Apr 2026

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
683839-99RecompletionXTO Energy Inc.Aug 5, 2009Aug 13, 2009—8,600
559543-98DrillNadel and Gussman, L.L.C.Jun 30, 2005Mar 25, 2005Apr 11, 20058,800
559543-99DrillNadel and Gussman, L.L.C.Mar 25, 2005Mar 25, 2005Apr 11, 20058,800

Completions

CompletedLeaseFieldOperatorStatusDepth
—— G-6-217384————
—— O-6-14430————
—— O-6-14670————

Formation tops

As filed on W-2/G-1. Subsea from 233 ft elevation.Download CSV →

FormationMD ftSubsea
Pettit6,426-6,193
Travis Peak6,602-6,369
Cotton Valley8,240-8,007

Perforations

Perforated and open-hole intervals.

FromToType
7,8187,822Perforated
7,8387,844Perforated
7,9437,946Perforated
7,9438,162Perforated
8,0228,025Perforated
8,1508,162Perforated
8,3248,340Perforated

Casing

Strings as reported, shallowest first.

Casing inSet atHole inCement
8.6251,01511290 S
5.58,6007.875800 S

Completion filings

W-2 and G-1 reports on record in the RRC wellbore file, newest first. The suffix identifies the wellbore or completion event. About these reports →

SuffixFiledW-2 / G-1 dateLogs referenced
00Mar 7, 2009Jan 26, 2009—
00Aug 30, 2007Jun 22, 2007—
00Jul 31, 2007——
00Nov 8, 2006Jun 23, 2006—
00Jul 27, 2006——
00Dec 7, 2005Aug 24, 2005—
00Nov 2, 2005Aug 15, 2005Yes
00Aug 31, 2005——

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/31530914, documented in the API reference.