WELL · 42-339-30975 · DISTRICT 3

Moody E. #32

Plugged

Montgomery County · Conroe (Cons. U) field  · Vertical

Moody E. #32 (API 42-339-30975) is a plugged well in Montgomery County, plugged September 5, 2025, last operated by Highmark Energy Operating LLC.

The RRC has issued 2 drilling permits (amended twice) between 1999 and 2004, permitted to 4,083 ft.

It was permitted by Wapiti Energy, LLC and has since transferred to Highmark Energy Operating LLC on the wellbore schedule.

Completion filings report one formation top, including Frio.

Operator of record

Highmark Energy Operating LLC

Permitted by Wapiti Energy, LLC; the EWA schedule now lists a different operator.

Houston, TX · P-5 Y, filed Dec 4, 2025 · 23 permits on file · (903) 876-2591

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore scheduleHighmark Energy Operating LLC
Production reportsDenbury Onshore, LLCthrough Dec 2016
Latest permitWapiti Energy, LLCAug 6, 2004

The sources disagree, which usually means a transfer or a lease-level production filing by a different entity. Petrora goes with the schedule.

4,083
total depth, ft
4
permits on file
Aug 6, 2004
last permit issued
Oct 29, 2004
completed
0
cumulative oil, bbl
365K
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS · Dec 1999 THROUGH Aug 2025

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
OFF SCHEDULE
Completed
Oct 29, 2004
Shut in
—
Plugged
Sep 5, 2025

Surface location

No coordinates on the permit record yet. The RRC's GIS record usually lands within days of issuance; historical master-file permits never carry one.

Lease production

PDQ LEASE REPORTS · REPORTED THROUGH APR 2026

Texas reports oil by lease, not by well. These are the 2 leases this well is completed on; they carry 2 wells in total, so volumes are shared.Why →

LeaseFieldReporting operatorWellsOil, bblGas, mcfReported
Moody #32 Unit G-3-176858Conroe (Frio 2800)Highmark Energy Operating, LLC1012.6KDec 1999 – Aug 2025
Moody, E. G-3-203954Conroe (Cons. U)Highmark Energy Operating, LLC10352KAug 2004 – Aug 2025

No volumes reported on these leases in the last three years.

Chain of custody

Every operator that reported production on this well's lease, in order.

  1. 1Whiting Petroleum CorporationApr 2000 → Mar 2001
  2. 2Wapiti Energy, LLCSep 2001 → Jul 2006
  3. 3Wapiti Operating, LLCAug 2006 → Dec 2009
  4. 4Denbury Onshore, LLCJan 2010 → Dec 2016

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
549256-99RecompletionWapiti Energy, LLCAug 6, 2004Aug 6, 2004—2,000
486052-96DrillWhiting Petroleum CorporationJan 25, 2000Aug 19, 1999—4,083
486052-97DrillWhiting Petroleum CorporationJan 25, 2000Aug 19, 1999—4,083
486052-99DrillWhiting Petroleum CorporationJul 22, 1999Aug 19, 1999Oct 15, 19994,050

Completions

CompletedLeaseFieldOperatorStatusDepth
—— G-3-176858————
—— G-3-203954————

Formation tops

As filed on W-2/G-1. Subsea from 175 ft elevation.Download CSV →

FormationMD ftSubsea
FrioFRIO (2800)2,994-2,819

Perforations

Perforated and open-hole intervals.

FromToType
524529Perforated
675679Perforated
2,9942,997Perforated
3,0043,006Perforated
3,0253,028Perforated

Casing

Strings as reported, shallowest first.

Casing inSet atHole inCement
9.6251,65012.25591 S
5.54,0728.751,000 S

Completion filings

W-2 and G-1 reports on record in the RRC wellbore file, newest first. The suffix identifies the wellbore or completion event. About these reports →

SuffixFiledW-2 / G-1 dateLogs referenced
00Mar 28, 2005Dec 2, 2004—
00Dec 16, 2004Oct 5, 2004Yes
00Nov 1, 2004——
00May 26, 2000May 3, 2000—
00May 16, 2000——

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/33930975, documented in the API reference.