WELL · 42-365-38344 · DISTRICT 6

Curtis-Kirby #3HH

Y

Panola County · Carthage (Haynesville Shale) field · Producing  · Horizontal

Curtis-Kirby #3HH (API 42-365-38344) is a horizontal well in Panola County operated by Tgnr Panola LLC, completed November 30, 2017 and listed as producing on the RRC schedule.

The RRC has issued one drilling permit, issued June 28, 2017, permitted to 11,500 ft.

It was permitted by Brammer Engineering, Inc. and has since transferred to Tgnr Panola LLC on the wellbore schedule.

Completion filings report 9 formation tops, including Nacatoch, Blossom, Fredericksburg, Paluxy.

No lease production has been reported under this well’s leases.

Operator of record

TGNR Panola LLC

Permitted by Brammer Engineering, Inc.; the EWA schedule now lists a different operator.

Houston, TX · P-5 Y, filed Dec 4, 2025 · 69 permits on file · (844) 888-9549

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore scheduleTGNR Panola LLC
Production reportsTGNR Panola LLCthrough Apr 2026
Latest permitBrammer Engineering, Inc.Jun 28, 2017

The sources disagree, which usually means a transfer or a lease-level production filing by a different entity. Petrora goes with the schedule.

11,500
total depth, ft
1
permits on file
Jun 28, 2017
last permit issued
Nov 30, 2017
completed
0
cumulative oil, bbl
14.5M
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS · Nov 2017 THROUGH Jul 2026

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
ON SCHEDULE
Completed
Nov 30, 2017
Shut in
—
Plugged
—

Operator's P-5 on the schedule: Active

Surface location

32.080679, -94.060748

OpenStreetMap → ·  Google Maps →

Permit surface location from the RRC GIS record, in Panola County.

Lease production

PDQ LEASE REPORTS · REPORTED THROUGH APR 2026

Texas reports oil by lease, not by well. These are the lease this well is completed on; this well is the only one on it.Why →

LeaseFieldReporting operatorWellsOil, bblGas, mcfReported
Curtis-Kirby G-6-283965Carthage (Haynesville Shale)TGNR Panola LLC1014.5MNov 2017 – Jul 2026

Gas, mcf lease total

Last 12 months 454,374 · prior 12 549,724(-17%)

050K100K202420252026

Chain of custody

Every operator that reported production on this well's lease, in order.

  1. 1Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Nov 2017 → Mar 2025
  2. 2TGNR Panola LLCApr 2025 → Apr 2026

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
827891-99DrillBrammer Engineering, Inc.Jun 15, 2017Jun 28, 2017Aug 17, 201711,500

Completions

CompletedLeaseFieldOperatorStatusDepth
—— G-6-283965————

Formation tops

As filed on W-2/G-1. Subsea from 271 ft elevation.Download CSV →

FormationMD ftSubsea
Nacatoch1,219-948
Blossom2,207-1,936
Fredericksburg2,693-2,422
Paluxy3,015-2,744
Glen Rose3,321-3,050
Rodessa5,069-4,798
PettitPETTET5,890-5,619
Travis Peak6,314-6,043
Cotton Valley8,984-8,713

Perforations

Perforated and open-hole intervals.

FromToType
11,61819,979Perforated

Casing

Strings as reported, shallowest first.

Casing inSet atHole inCement
162,522202,565 S
10.755,90213.51,475 S
7.62510,2059.8751,035 S
5.520,1226.751,130 S
520,1226.751,130 S

Completion filings

W-2 and G-1 reports on record in the RRC wellbore file, newest first. The suffix identifies the wellbore or completion event. About these reports →

SuffixFiledW-2 / G-1 dateLogs referenced
00May 29, 2018Mar 5, 2018Yes

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

Nearby wells and their tops

NEAREST 8 LOCATED WELLS WITH TOPS · WITHIN 16 KM

Draw a cross-section

This well's tops beside its 5 nearest neighbours, subsea-aligned so they line up regardless of surface terrain.

Open the cross-section →

Hooper HV Unit H42-365-38627

1.6 KM · Rockcliff Energy Operating LLC · Section with this well →

Nacatoch900-601
Blossom1,880-1,581
Fredericksburg2,540-2,241
Paluxy2,660-2,361
Glen Rose3,420-3,121
Rodessa4,790-4,491
Pettit5,620-5,321
Travis Peak5,970-5,671

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Hooper HV Unit G42-365-38626

1.6 KM · Rockcliff Energy Operating LLC · Section with this well →

Nacatoch900-601
Blossom1,880-1,581
Fredericksburg2,540-2,241
Paluxy2,660-2,361
Glen Rose3,420-3,121
Rodessa4,790-4,491
Pettit5,620-5,321
Travis Peak5,970-5,671

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Hooper HV Unit F42-365-38625

1.6 KM · Rockcliff Energy Operating LLC · Section with this well →

Nacatoch900-601
Blossom1,880-1,581
Fredericksburg2,540-2,241
Paluxy2,660-2,361
Glen Rose3,420-3,121
Rodessa4,790-4,491
Pettit5,620-5,321
Travis Peak5,970-5,671

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Hooper HV Unit E42-365-38624

1.6 KM · Rockcliff Energy Operating LLC · Section with this well →

Nacatoch900-601
Blossom1,880-1,581
Fredericksburg2,540-2,241
Paluxy2,660-2,361
Glen Rose3,420-3,121
Rodessa4,790-4,491
Pettit5,620-5,321
Travis Peak5,970-5,671

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

American Legion42-365-33605

1.9 KM · Texaco E & P Inc. · Section with this well →

BMA4,831-4,564
Rodessa5,177-4,910
Pettit5,879-5,612
Travis Peak6,297-6,030
Cotton Valley8,539-8,272

Hooper HV Unit D42-365-38622

1.9 KM · Rockcliff Energy Operating LLC · Section with this well →

Nacatoch900-590
Blossom1,880-1,570
Fredericksburg2,540-2,230
Paluxy2,660-2,350
Glen Rose3,420-3,110
Rodessa4,790-4,480
Pettit5,620-5,310
Travis Peak5,970-5,660

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Hooper HV Unit C42-365-38621

1.9 KM · Rockcliff Energy Operating LLC · Section with this well →

Nacatoch900-590
Blossom1,880-1,570
Fredericksburg2,540-2,230
Paluxy2,660-2,350
Glen Rose3,420-3,110
Rodessa4,790-4,480
Pettit5,620-5,310
Travis Peak5,970-5,660

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Hooper HV Unit B42-365-38620

1.9 KM · Rockcliff Energy Operating LLC · Section with this well →

Nacatoch900-590
Blossom1,880-1,570
Fredericksburg2,540-2,230
Paluxy2,660-2,350
Glen Rose3,420-3,110
Rodessa4,790-4,480
Pettit5,620-5,310
Travis Peak5,970-5,660

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/36538344, documented in the API reference.