WELL · 42-405-30976 · DISTRICT 6
Higginbotham-Bison #1B
San Augustine County · Horizontal
Higginbotham-Bison #1B (API 42-405-30976) is a permitted horizontal well in San Augustine County filed by Xto Energy Inc.; no completion report is on file yet.
The RRC has issued one drilling permit, issued October 6, 2026, permitted to 14,849 ft.
Operator of record
Spring, TX · P-5 Y, filed Feb 4, 2026 · 16,153 permits on file · (832) 625-1100
SOURCE · LATEST PERMIT (NO EWA RECORD)
What each RRC source says
| Wellbore schedule | none |
| Production reports | none |
| Latest permit | XTO Energy Inc.Oct 6, 2026 |
- 14,849
- total depth, ft
- 1
- permits on file
- Oct 6, 2026
- last permit issued
- —
- completed
- —
- cumulative oil, bbl
- —
- cumulative gas, mcf
PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS
Surface location
31.563325, -94.025426
OpenStreetMap → · Google Maps →
Permit surface location from the RRC GIS record, in San Augustine County.
Only the permit record exists for this well so far, here and in the RRC's wellbore query. Completion reports, formation tops, lease production, and the scanned filings appear once the operator files a completion report, typically months after drilling. Petrora refreshes the wellbore file weekly, so a filing from the last few days may reach the RRC before it shows here. How long each source takes →
Permits
| Permit | Type | Operator | Received | Issued | Spud | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 917339-99 | Drill | XTO Energy Inc. | Jul 21, 2026 | Oct 6, 2026 | — | 14,849 |
Nearby wells and their tops
NEAREST 8 LOCATED WELLS WITH TOPS · WITHIN 16 KM
Draw a cross-section
This well has no tops filed, so it cannot anchor a section; its neighbours can.
Black Stone42-405-30715
2.0 KM · C6 Operating, L.L.C. · Section with this well →
| Austin Chalk | 4,214 | -3,709 |
| James Lime | 7,496 | -6,991 |
| Bossier | 12,229 | -11,724 |
| Haynesville | — |
Wilma Richards B42-405-30745
2.8 KM · C6 Operating, L.L.C. · Section with this well →
| Austin Chalk | 4,230 | -3,824 |
| James Lime | 7,575 | -7,169 |
| Cotton Valley | 11,300 | -10,894 |
| Haynesville | — |
Highlands HG42-405-30798
2.9 KM · Pine Wave Energy Partners Op,llc · Section with this well →
| Austin Chalk | 4,167 | -3,747 |
| James Lime | 7,449 | -7,029 |
| Cotton Valley | 11,809 | -11,389 |
| Bossier | 12,132 | -11,712 |
| Haynesville | — |
Highlands GU42-405-30797
3.0 KM · Pine Wave Energy Partners Op,llc · Section with this well →
| Austin Chalk | 4,169 | -3,748 |
| James Lime | 7,451 | -7,030 |
| Cotton Valley | 11,811 | -11,390 |
| Bossier | 12,147 | -11,726 |
| Haynesville | 14,538 | -14,117 |
Williams-Chumley WW42-405-30781
3.8 KM · Pine Wave Energy Partners Op,llc · Section with this well →
| Midway | 2,453 | -2,098 |
| Austin Chalk | 4,394 | -4,039 |
| Paluxy | 5,204 | -4,849 |
| Glen Rose | 5,466 | -5,111 |
| James Lime | 7,644 | -7,289 |
| Travis Peak | 8,776 | -8,421 |
| Cotton Valley | 11,346 | -10,991 |
| Bossier | 12,386 | -12,031 |
9 TOPS · FIRST 8
Williams-Chumley WW42-405-30774
3.8 KM · Pine Wave Energy Partners Op,llc · Section with this well →
| Midway | 2,453 | -2,098 |
| Austin Chalk | 4,394 | -4,039 |
| Fredericksburg | 4,838 | -4,483 |
| Paluxy | 5,204 | -4,849 |
| Rodessa | 7,020 | -6,665 |
| James Lime | 7,644 | -7,289 |
| Travis Peak | 8,776 | -8,421 |
| Haynesville | 13,072 | -12,717 |
Williams Chumley WO B42-405-30808
4.4 KM · Pine Wave Energy Partners Op,llc · Section with this well →
| Austin Chalk | 4,438 | -3,997 |
| James Lime | 7,741 | -7,300 |
| Cotton Valley | 11,520 | -11,079 |
| Bossier | 12,477 | -12,036 |
| Bossier | 13,115 | -12,674 |
| Haynesville | — |
Williams Chumley Wso42-405-30809
4.5 KM · Pine Wave Energy Partners Op,llc · Section with this well →
| Austin Chalk | 4,430 | -3,989 |
| James Lime | 7,750 | -7,309 |
| Cotton Valley | 11,535 | -11,094 |
| Bossier | 12,485 | -12,044 |
| Bossier | 13,041 | -12,600 |
| Haynesville | — |
About this data
Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.
New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease
Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/40530976, documented in the API reference.