WELL · 42-419-31711 · DISTRICT 6
Red Raiders DU #2H
Shelby County · Horizontal
Red Raiders Du #2H (API 42-419-31711) is a permitted horizontal well in Shelby County filed by Xto Energy Inc.; no completion report is on file yet.
The RRC has issued 2 drilling permits between 2012 and 2021, permitted to 20,500 ft.
Completion filings report 10 formation tops, including Nacatoch, Saratoga, Blossom, Fredericksburg.
Operator of record
Spring, TX · P-5 Y, filed Feb 4, 2026 · 16,153 permits on file · (832) 625-1100
SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE
What each RRC source says
| Wellbore schedule | none |
| Production reports | XTO Energy Inc.through Apr 2026 |
| Latest permit | XTO Energy Inc.Dec 22, 2021 |
- 20,500
- total depth, ft
- 2
- permits on file
- Dec 22, 2021
- last permit issued
- —
- completed
- 0
- cumulative oil, bbl
- 1.29M
- cumulative gas, mcf
PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS · May 2022 THROUGH Jul 2026
Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file
- Schedule
- OFF SCHEDULE
- Completed
- —
- Shut in
- —
- Plugged
- —
Surface location
31.646859, -94.205537
OpenStreetMap → · Google Maps →
Permit surface location from the RRC GIS record, in Shelby County.
Lease production
PDQ LEASE REPORTS · REPORTED THROUGH APR 2026
Texas reports oil by lease, not by well. These are the lease this well is completed on; this well is the only one on it.Why →
| Lease | Field | Reporting operator | Wells | Oil, bbl | Gas, mcf | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Raiders DU G-6-293593 | Carthage (Haynesville Shale) | XTO Energy Inc. | 1 | 0 | 1.29M | May 2022 – Jul 2026 |
Gas, mcf lease total
Last 12 months 1,294,403 · prior 12 0
Chain of custody
Every operator that reported production on this well's lease, in order.
- 1XTO Energy Inc.Jan 2026 → Apr 2026
Permits
| Permit | Type | Operator | Received | Issued | Spud | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 875308-99 | Drill | XTO Energy Inc. | Dec 14, 2021 | Dec 22, 2021 | Feb 3, 2022 | 20,500 |
| 732641-99 | Drill | XTO Energy Inc. | Jan 30, 2012 | Feb 17, 2012 | — | 20,500 |
Completions
| Completed | Lease | Field | Operator | Status | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — G-6-293593 | — | — | — | — |
Formation tops
As filed on W-2/G-1. Subsea from 419 ft elevation.Download CSV →
| Formation | MD ft | Subsea |
|---|---|---|
| Nacatoch | 2,877 | -2,458 |
| Saratoga | 2,964 | -2,545 |
| Blossom | 3,611 | -3,192 |
| Fredericksburg | 4,615 | -4,196 |
| Paluxy | 4,835 | -4,416 |
| Glen Rose | 5,015 | -4,596 |
| Rodessa | 6,594 | -6,175 |
| James Lime | 7,152 | -6,733 |
| PettitPETTET | 7,460 | -7,041 |
| Travis Peak | 8,142 | -7,723 |
Perforations
Perforated and open-hole intervals.
| From | To | Type |
|---|---|---|
| 12,858 | 21,207 | Perforated |
Casing
Strings as reported, shallowest first.
| Casing in | Set at | Hole in | Cement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.75 | 2,058 | 13.5 | 915 S |
| 7.625 | 11,804 | 9.875 | 1,290 S |
| 5.5 | 21,242 | 6.75 | 310 S |
| 5 | 21,242 | 6.75 | 670 S |
Completion filings
W-2 and G-1 reports on record in the RRC wellbore file, newest first. The suffix identifies the wellbore or completion event. About these reports →
| Suffix | Filed | W-2 / G-1 date | Logs referenced |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00 | Mar 5, 2026 | Feb 17, 2026 | — |
| 00 | Dec 19, 2022 | Sep 23, 2022 | Yes |
The source documents
Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.
- Wellbore filings for 42-419-31711 → W-2, G-1, plugging reports, as PDFs
- Completion packets for 42-419-31711 → scanned completion filings
Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.
Nearby wells and their tops
NEAREST 8 LOCATED WELLS WITH TOPS · WITHIN 16 KM
Draw a cross-section
This well's tops beside its 5 nearest neighbours, subsea-aligned so they line up regardless of surface terrain.
Owls-Sun Devils42-419-31824
0.0 KM · XTO Energy Inc. · Section with this well →
| Nacatoch | 2,877 | -2,458 |
| Saratoga | 2,963 | -2,544 |
| Annona Chalk | 3,229 | -2,810 |
| Blossom | 3,604 | -3,185 |
| Fredericksburg | 4,609 | -4,190 |
| Paluxy | 4,829 | -4,410 |
| Glen Rose | 5,011 | -4,592 |
| Rodessa | 6,588 | -6,169 |
11 TOPS · FIRST 8
Red Raiders (SL) DU42-419-31713
0.5 KM · XTO Energy Inc. · Section with this well →
| Haynesville | 11,724 | -11,314 |
| Bossier | 11,772 | -11,362 |
| Bossier | 11,845 | -11,435 |
Vandals DU42-419-31796
1.8 KM · XTO Energy Inc. · Section with this well →
| Nacatoch | 2,775 | -2,384 |
| Saratoga | 2,869 | -2,478 |
| Blossom | 3,525 | -3,134 |
| Paluxy | 4,570 | -4,179 |
| Glen Rose | 4,950 | -4,559 |
| Rodessa | 6,570 | -6,179 |
| James Lime | 7,048 | -6,657 |
| Pettit | 7,431 | -7,040 |
10 TOPS · FIRST 8
Fightin' Illini DU42-419-31795
2.6 KM · XTO Energy Inc. · Section with this well →
| Rodessa | 6,596 | -6,150 |
| James Lime | 7,107 | -6,661 |
| Pettit | 7,394 | -6,948 |
| Travis Peak | 8,161 | -7,715 |
| Haynesville | 12,812 | -12,366 |
| Nacatoch | — | |
| Glen Rose | — | |
| Cotton Valley | — |
13 TOPS · FIRST 8
Sun Devils42-405-30786
2.6 KM · XTO Energy Inc. · Section with this well →
| Austin Chalk | 3,948 | -3,564 |
| James Lime | 7,222 | -6,838 |
| Haynesville | 12,314 | -11,930 |
Vmo42-405-30782
2.6 KM · XTO Energy Inc. · Section with this well →
| Austin Chalk | 3,937 | -3,552 |
| James Lime | 7,224 | -6,839 |
| Haynesville | 12,326 | -11,941 |
Vandals-Mustangs42-405-30787
2.6 KM · XTO Energy Inc. · Section with this well →
| Austin Chalk | 3,932 | -3,548 |
| James Lime | 7,221 | -6,837 |
| Haynesville | 12,344 | -11,960 |
Hoosiers DU42-419-31804
3.8 KM · XTO Energy Inc. · Section with this well →
| Nacatoch | 2,812 | -2,369 |
| Saratoga | 2,889 | -2,446 |
| Blossom | 3,555 | -3,112 |
| Fredericksburg | 4,396 | -3,953 |
| Paluxy | 4,619 | -4,176 |
| Glen Rose | 4,938 | -4,495 |
| Rodessa | 6,568 | -6,125 |
| James Lime | 7,100 | -6,657 |
10 TOPS · FIRST 8
About this data
Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.
New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease
Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/41931711, documented in the API reference.