WELL · 42-423-32449 · DISTRICT 6

McGehee #1

Plugged

Smith County · Wildcat field  · Directional

Mcgehee #1 (API 42-423-32449) is a plugged well in Smith County, plugged August 13, 2021, last operated by Strand Energy L.C..

The RRC has issued one drilling permit, issued June 2, 2021, permitted to 9,900 ft.

It was permitted by Strand Energy, L.C. and has since transferred to Strand Energy L.C. on the wellbore schedule.

Operator of record

Strand Energy L.C.

Permitted by Strand Energy, L.C.; the EWA schedule now lists a different operator.

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore schedulenone
Production reportsnone
Latest permitStrand Energy, L.C.Jun 2, 2021

The sources disagree, which usually means a transfer or a lease-level production filing by a different entity. Petrora goes with the schedule.

9,900
total depth, ft
1
permits on file
Jun 2, 2021
last permit issued
—
completed
—
cumulative oil, bbl
—
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
OFF SCHEDULE
Completed
—
Shut in
—
Plugged
Aug 13, 2021

Surface location

32.580084, -95.365462

OpenStreetMap → ·  Google Maps →

Permit surface location from the RRC GIS record, in Smith County.

Only the permit record exists for this well so far, here and in the RRC's wellbore query. Completion reports, formation tops, lease production, and the scanned filings appear once the operator files a completion report, typically months after drilling. Petrora refreshes the wellbore file weekly, so a filing from the last few days may reach the RRC before it shows here. How long each source takes →

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
870107-99DrillStrand Energy, L.C.May 26, 2021Jun 2, 2021Jul 26, 20219,900

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

Nearby wells and their tops

NEAREST 8 LOCATED WELLS WITH TOPS · WITHIN 16 KM

Draw a cross-section

This well has no tops filed, so it cannot anchor a section; its neighbours can.

Section of the neighbours →

Gift Ranch42-423-32418

0.8 KM · Strand Energy, L.C. · Section with this well →

Nacatoch2,300-1,961
Pecan Gap3,175-2,836
Sub-Clarksville5,045-4,706
Austin Chalk5,157-4,818
Woodbine5,389-5,050
Pettit—
Rodessa—
Cotton Valley—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Gift Ranch42-423-32404

0.9 KM · Strand Energy, L.C. · Section with this well →

Nacatoch2,370-2,039
Pecan Gap3,185-2,854
Austin Chalk4,853-4,522
Sub-Clarksville4,992-4,661
Paluxy—
Woodbine—
Travis Peak—
Rodessa—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Gift Ranch42-423-32403

1.0 KM · Strand Energy, L.C. · Section with this well →

Nacatoch2,410-2,058
Pecan Gap3,196-2,844
Austin Chalk4,820-4,468
Sub-Clarksville5,010-4,658
Woodbine—
Cotton Valley—
Travis Peak—
Pettit—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Mallory42-423-32411

3.2 KM · Strand Energy, L.C. · Section with this well →

Nacatoch2,260-1,907
Woodbine5,300-4,947
Paluxy7,430-7,077
Rodessa9,150-8,797
Travis Peak—
Cotton Valley—
Pettit—

Anderson Charitable Trust42-423-32304

3.2 KM · Maximus Operating, Ltd. · Section with this well →

Austin Chalk5,050-4,748
T. Woodbine5,585-5,283
Woodbine5,585-5,283
T. Buda6,030-5,728
Buda6,030-5,728
T. Goodland7,085-6,783
Paluxy7,165-6,863
T. Paluxy7,165-6,863

13 TOPS · FIRST 8

KNG42-423-32430

3.4 KM · Strand Energy, L.C. · Section with this well →

Nacatoch2,230-1,923
Woodbine5,150-4,843
Paluxy7,160-6,853
Pettit—
Cotton Valley—
Rodessa—
Travis Peak—

Fleming42-423-30600

3.6 KM · Strand Energy, L.C. · Section with this well →

Austin Chalk4,763-4,350
Woodbine5,463-5,050
Pettit9,955-9,542
Travis Peak10,121-9,708

Matthews- Ford42-499-32189

4.3 KM · Strand Energy, L.C. · Section with this well →

Nacatoch2,165-1,873
Sub-Clarksville4,990-4,698
Paluxy—
Austin Chalk—
Smackover—
Woodbine—
Rodessa—
Glen Rose—

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/42332449, documented in the API reference.