WELL · 42-423-32469 · DISTRICT 6

Cox Unit #1

Plugged

Smith County · Wildcat field  · Directional

Cox Unit #1 (API 42-423-32469) is a plugged well in Smith County, plugged May 3, 2024, last operated by 3-T Exploration Inc..

The RRC has issued one drilling permit, issued April 5, 2024, permitted to 7,850 ft.

It was permitted by 3-T Exploration, Inc. and has since transferred to 3-T Exploration Inc. on the wellbore schedule.

Operator of record

3-T Exploration Inc.

Permitted by 3-T Exploration, Inc.; the EWA schedule now lists a different operator.

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore schedulenone
Production reportsnone
Latest permit3-T Exploration, Inc.Apr 5, 2024

The sources disagree, which usually means a transfer or a lease-level production filing by a different entity. Petrora goes with the schedule.

7,850
total depth, ft
1
permits on file
Apr 5, 2024
last permit issued
—
completed
—
cumulative oil, bbl
—
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
OFF SCHEDULE
Completed
—
Shut in
—
Plugged
May 3, 2024

Surface location

32.223674, -95.363202

OpenStreetMap → ·  Google Maps →

Permit surface location from the RRC GIS record, in Smith County.

Only the permit record exists for this well so far, here and in the RRC's wellbore query. Completion reports, formation tops, lease production, and the scanned filings appear once the operator files a completion report, typically months after drilling. Petrora refreshes the wellbore file weekly, so a filing from the last few days may reach the RRC before it shows here. How long each source takes →

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
897229-99Drill3-T Exploration, Inc.Feb 8, 2024Apr 5, 2024Apr 15, 20247,850

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

Nearby wells and their tops

NEAREST 8 LOCATED WELLS WITH TOPS · WITHIN 16 KM

Draw a cross-section

This well has no tops filed, so it cannot anchor a section; its neighbours can.

Section of the neighbours →

McKeethan42-423-32400

3.9 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch2,910-2,432
Woodbine5,160-4,682
Paluxy7,480-7,002
Rodessa9,465-8,987
Pettit10,165-9,687
Travis Peak10,355-9,877
Cotton Valley—

Clyburn42-423-32401

4.6 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch2,940-2,429
Woodbine5,150-4,639
Paluxy7,520-7,009
Rodessa9,520-9,009
Pettit10,210-9,699
Travis Peak10,400-9,889
Cotton Valley—

Anderson42-423-32392

4.7 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,100-2,702
Woodbine5,850-5,452
Goodland8,700-8,302
Goodland8,700-8,302
Travis Peak—
Cotton Valley—
Pettit—
Paluxy—

9 TOPS · FIRST 8

Jones42-423-32393

4.7 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,100-2,702
Woodbine5,860-5,462
Goodland8,830-8,432
Goodland8,830-8,432
Paluxy8,830-8,432
Rodessa—
Pettit—
Cotton Valley—

9 TOPS · FIRST 8

McCrary42-423-32484

4.8 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,393-2,884
Woodbine6,276-5,767
Paluxy9,337-8,828
Rodessa11,226-10,717
Pettit11,906-11,397
Travis Peak12,111-11,602
Cotton Valley—

McCrary42-423-32480

4.8 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,404-2,895
Woodbine6,292-5,783
Goodland9,049-8,540
Travis Peak—
Cotton Valley—
Paluxy—
Pettit—
Rodessa—

Clay42-423-32425

5.5 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,805-3,344
Austin Chalk5,441-4,980
Woodbine6,244-5,783
Buda7,422-6,961
Goodland8,856-8,395
Rodessa—
Travis Peak—
Pettit—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Thedford42-423-32426

5.6 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,796-3,335
Austin Chalk5,441-4,980
Woodbine6,235-5,774
Buda7,422-6,961
Goodland8,856-8,395
Cotton Valley—
Paluxy—
Travis Peak—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/42332469, documented in the API reference.