WELL · 42-423-32485 · DISTRICT 6

Thedford #2H

N

Smith County  · Horizontal

Thedford #2H (API 42-423-32485) is a permitted horizontal well in Smith County filed by Valence Operating Company; no completion report is on file yet.

The RRC has issued one drilling permit (amended twice), issued February 12, 2026, permitted to 9,300 ft.

Operator of record

Valence Operating Company

Kingwood, TX · P-5 Y, filed Apr 4, 2026 · 990 permits on file · (281) 359-3659

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore schedulenone
Production reportsnone
Latest permitValence Operating CompanyFeb 12, 2026
9,300
total depth, ft
3
permits on file
Feb 12, 2026
last permit issued
—
completed
—
cumulative oil, bbl
—
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
OFF SCHEDULE
Completed
—
Shut in
—
Plugged
—

Surface location

32.252882, -95.400419

OpenStreetMap → ·  Google Maps →

Permit surface location from the RRC GIS record, in Smith County.

Only the permit record exists for this well so far, here and in the RRC's wellbore query. Completion reports, formation tops, lease production, and the scanned filings appear once the operator files a completion report, typically months after drilling. Petrora refreshes the wellbore file weekly, so a filing from the last few days may reach the RRC before it shows here. How long each source takes →

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
913392-97DrillValence Operating CompanyOct 6, 2026Feb 12, 2026—9,300
913392-98DrillValence Operating CompanyMar 25, 2026Feb 12, 2026—9,300
913392-99DrillValence Operating CompanyFeb 10, 2026Feb 12, 2026—9,300

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

Nearby wells and their tops

NEAREST 8 LOCATED WELLS WITH TOPS · WITHIN 16 KM

Draw a cross-section

This well has no tops filed, so it cannot anchor a section; its neighbours can.

Section of the neighbours →

McCrary42-423-32484

0.0 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,393-2,884
Woodbine6,276-5,767
Paluxy9,337-8,828
Rodessa11,226-10,717
Pettit11,906-11,397
Travis Peak12,111-11,602
Cotton Valley—

McCrary42-423-32480

0.0 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,404-2,895
Woodbine6,292-5,783
Goodland9,049-8,540
Cotton Valley—
Travis Peak—
Rodessa—
Pettit—
Paluxy—

Thedford42-423-32426

1.8 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,796-3,335
Austin Chalk5,441-4,980
Woodbine6,235-5,774
Buda7,422-6,961
Goodland8,856-8,395
Cotton Valley—
Rodessa—
Travis Peak—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Clay42-423-32425

1.8 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,805-3,344
Austin Chalk5,441-4,980
Woodbine6,244-5,783
Buda7,422-6,961
Goodland8,856-8,395
Pettit—
Rodessa—
Travis Peak—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Cleo42-423-32466

4.9 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,153-2,681
Woodbine5,949-5,477
Paluxy8,702-8,230
Goodland8,702-8,230
Pettit—
Travis Peak—
Rodessa—
Cotton Valley—

Antony42-423-32465

4.9 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,139-2,667
Woodbine5,935-5,463
Paluxy8,706-8,234
Goodland8,706-8,234
Pettit—
Travis Peak—
Rodessa—
Cotton Valley—

Shubert42-423-32446

5.3 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,183-2,711
Woodbine5,942-5,470
Goodland8,977-8,505
Paluxy—
Cotton Valley—
Pettit—
Travis Peak—
Rodessa—

Hemphill42-423-32448

5.3 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,184-2,712
Woodbine5,918-5,446
Goodland8,904-8,432
Cotton Valley—
Travis Peak—
Rodessa—
Pettit—
Paluxy—

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/42332485, documented in the API reference.