WELL · 42-479-43684 · DISTRICT 1

Gates 05D Unit K #5021A

Y

Webb County · Gates Ranch (Eagle Ford Shale) field · Producing  · Horizontal

Gates 05d Unit K #5021A (API 42-479-43684) is a horizontal well in Webb County operated by Rosetta Resources Operating LP, completed November 3, 2017 and listed as producing on the RRC schedule.

The RRC has issued 2 drilling permits between 2017 and 2019, permitted to 8,999 ft.

Completion filings report 10 formation tops, including Eagle Ford, Catahoula, Cook Mountain, Edwards.

No lease production has been reported under this well’s leases.

Operator of record

Rosetta Resources Operating LP

San Antonio, TX · P-5 Y, filed Aug 4, 2025 · 1,218 permits on file · (210) 384-5000

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore scheduleRosetta Resources Operating LP
Production reportsRosetta Resources Operating LPthrough Apr 2026
Latest permitRosetta Resources Operating LPFeb 1, 2019
8,999
total depth, ft
2
permits on file
Feb 1, 2019
last permit issued
Nov 3, 2017
completed
0
cumulative oil, bbl
7.42M
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS · Nov 2017 THROUGH Jul 2026

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
ON SCHEDULE
Completed
Nov 3, 2017
Shut in
—
Plugged
—

Operator's P-5 on the schedule: Active

Surface location

28.061404, -99.765410

OpenStreetMap → ·  Google Maps →

Permit surface location from the RRC GIS record, in Webb County.

Lease production

PDQ LEASE REPORTS · REPORTED THROUGH APR 2026

Texas reports oil by lease, not by well. These are the 2 leases this well is completed on; they carry 2 wells in total, so volumes are shared.Why →

LeaseFieldReporting operatorWellsOil, bblGas, mcfReported
Gates 05D Unit K G-1-285994Ammann (Buda)Rosetta Resources Operating LP100Nov 2017 – Jul 2026
Gates 05D Unit K G-4-284318Gates Ranch (Eagle Ford Shale)Rosetta Resources Operating LP107.42MNov 2017 – Jul 2026

Gas, mcf lease total

Last 12 months 285,845 · prior 12 316,626(-10%)

020K40K60K202420252026

Chain of custody

Every operator that reported production on this well's lease, in order.

  1. 1Rosetta Resources Operating LPNov 2017 → Apr 2026

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
848829-99RecompletionRosetta Resources Operating LPJan 16, 2019Feb 1, 2019Apr 10, 20178,900
822208-99DrillRosetta Resources Operating LPJan 17, 2017Jan 26, 2017Apr 10, 20178,999

Completions

CompletedLeaseFieldOperatorStatusDepth
—— G-1-285994————
—— G-4-284318————

Formation tops

As filed on W-2/G-1. Subsea from 781 ft elevation.Download CSV →

FormationMD ftSubsea
Eagle FordEAGLE FORD SHALE8,647-7,866
CatahoulaCATAHOULA-FRIO - INJECTION/DISPO——
Cook Mountain——
EdwardsEDWARDS LIMESTONE - H2S——
EscondidoESCONDITO - INJECTION/DISPOSAL;——
JacksonJACKSON - INJECTION/DISPOSAL——
OlmosOLMOS - INJECTION/DISPOSAL——
Queen CityQUEEN CITY - INJECTION/DISPOSAL;——
WilcoxWILCOX - INJECTION/DISPOSAL——
YeguaYEGUA - INJECTION/DISPOSAL——

Perforations

Perforated and open-hole intervals.

FromToType
9,36517,133Perforated

Casing

Strings as reported, shallowest first.

Casing inSet atHole inCement
9.6253,40412.25974 S
5.517,1898.753,070 S

Completion filings

W-2 and G-1 reports on record in the RRC wellbore file, newest first. The suffix identifies the wellbore or completion event. About these reports →

SuffixFiledW-2 / G-1 dateLogs referenced
00Mar 12, 2019Feb 4, 2019—
00Jul 20, 2018Mar 12, 2018Yes

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

Nearby wells and their tops

NEAREST 8 LOCATED WELLS WITH TOPS · WITHIN 16 KM

Draw a cross-section

This well's tops beside its 5 nearest neighbours, subsea-aligned so they line up regardless of surface terrain.

Open the cross-section →

Gates 05D Unit M42-479-43687

0.3 KM · Rosetta Resources Operating LP · Section with this well →

Escondido3,700-2,940
Olmos5,208-4,448
Austin Chalk8,040-7,280
Eagle Ford8,413-7,653
Queen City—
Wilcox—
Yegua—
Edwards—

11 TOPS · FIRST 8

Loma Blanca42-479-44292

2.1 KM · Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd. · Section with this well →

Jackson6904
Queen City899-205
Yegua1,098-404
Catahoula1,497-803
Wilcox1,797-1,103
Escondido2,296-1,602
Cook Mountain3,958-3,264
Olmos5,367-4,673

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Loma Blanca42-479-44288

2.1 KM · Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd. · Section with this well →

Jackson69016
Queen City899-193
Yegua1,098-392
Catahoula1,497-791
Wilcox1,797-1,091
Escondido2,296-1,590
Cook Mountain3,958-3,252
Olmos5,367-4,661

11 TOPS · FIRST 8

Loma Blanca42-479-44289

2.2 KM · Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd. · Section with this well →

Jackson69017
Queen City899-192
Yegua1,098-391
Catahoula1,497-790
Wilcox1,797-1,090
Escondido2,296-1,589
Cook Mountain3,958-3,251
Olmos5,367-4,660

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Galvan Ranch42-479-45148

2.6 KM · SM Energy Company · Section with this well →

Wilcox2,279-1,574
Midway3,415-2,710
Escondido3,903-3,198
Olmos5,305-4,600
San Miguel6,873-6,168
Anacacho7,786-7,081
Austin Chalk8,219-7,514
Edwards—

15 TOPS · FIRST 8

Galvan Ranch42-479-45149

2.6 KM · SM Energy Company · Section with this well →

Wilcox2,279-1,575
Midway3,415-2,711
Escondido3,898-3,194
Olmos5,311-4,607
San Miguel6,889-6,185
Anacacho7,797-7,093
Jackson—
Queen City—

11 TOPS · FIRST 8

Galvan Ranch42-479-45158

2.6 KM · SM Energy Company · Section with this well →

Wilcox2,256-1,565
Escondido3,901-3,210
Olmos5,293-4,602
San Miguel6,866-6,175
Anacacho7,776-7,085
Austin Chalk8,177-7,486
Jackson—
Queen City—

13 TOPS · FIRST 8

Galvan Ranch42-479-45159

2.7 KM · SM Energy Company · Section with this well →

Wilcox2,256-1,565
Escondido3,892-3,201
Olmos5,302-4,611
San Miguel6,900-6,209
Anacacho7,782-7,091
Austin Chalk8,194-7,503
Yegua—
Catahoula—

14 TOPS · FIRST 8

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/47943684, documented in the API reference.