WELL · 42-479-43808 · DISTRICT 4

Gates 05-D Unit P #1305

Y

Webb County · Gates Ranch (Eagle Ford Shale) field · Producing  · Horizontal

Gates 05-D Unit P #1305 (API 42-479-43808) is a horizontal well in Webb County operated by Rosetta Resources Operating LP, completed May 9, 2018 and listed as producing on the RRC schedule.

The RRC has issued one drilling permit (amended once), issued October 24, 2017, permitted to 8,999 ft.

Completion filings report 11 formation tops, including Escondido, Olmos, Austin Chalk, Eagle Ford.

No lease production has been reported under this well’s leases.

Operator of record

Rosetta Resources Operating LP

San Antonio, TX · P-5 Y, filed Aug 4, 2025 · 1,218 permits on file · (210) 384-5000

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore scheduleRosetta Resources Operating LP
Production reportsRosetta Resources Operating LPthrough Apr 2026
Latest permitRosetta Resources Operating LPOct 24, 2017
8,999
total depth, ft
2
permits on file
Oct 24, 2017
last permit issued
May 9, 2018
completed
0
cumulative oil, bbl
3.84M
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS · May 2018 THROUGH Jul 2026

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
ON SCHEDULE
Completed
May 9, 2018
Shut in
—
Plugged
—

Operator's P-5 on the schedule: Active

Surface location

28.086409, -99.795234

OpenStreetMap → ·  Google Maps →

Permit surface location from the RRC GIS record, in Webb County.

Lease production

PDQ LEASE REPORTS · REPORTED THROUGH APR 2026

Texas reports oil by lease, not by well. These are the lease this well is completed on; this well is the only one on it.Why →

LeaseFieldReporting operatorWellsOil, bblGas, mcfReported
Gates '05-D' Unit P G-4-285148Gates Ranch (Eagle Ford Shale)Rosetta Resources Operating LP103.84MMay 2018 – Jul 2026

Gas, mcf lease total

Last 12 months 176,183 · prior 12 174,795(+1%)

010K20K30K202420252026

Chain of custody

Every operator that reported production on this well's lease, in order.

  1. 1Rosetta Resources Operating LPMay 2018 → Apr 2026

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
831937-98DrillRosetta Resources Operating LPAug 1, 2018Oct 24, 2017Dec 6, 20178,999
831937-99DrillRosetta Resources Operating LPOct 12, 2017Oct 24, 2017—8,999

Completions

CompletedLeaseFieldOperatorStatusDepth
—— G-4-285148————

Formation tops

As filed on W-2/G-1. Subsea from 711 ft elevation.Download CSV →

FormationMD ftSubsea
EscondidoESCONDITO - INJECTION/DISPOSAL;3,435-2,724
OlmosOLMOS - INJECTION/DISPOSAL4,866-4,155
Austin Chalk7,782-7,071
Eagle FordEAGLE FORD SHALE8,170-7,459
CatahoulaCATAHOULA-FRIO - INJECTION/DISPO——
Cook Mountain——
EdwardsEDWARDS LIMESTONE - H2S——
JacksonJACKSON - INJECTION/DISPOSAL——
Queen CityQUEEN CITY - INJECTION/DISPOSAL;——
WilcoxWILCOX - INJECTION/DISPOSAL——
YeguaYEGUA - INJECTION/DISPOSAL——

Perforations

Perforated and open-hole intervals.

FromToType
8,81313,893Perforated

Casing

Strings as reported, shallowest first.

Casing inSet atHole inCement
9.6253,24312.25980 S
5.513,9928.752,432 S

Completion filings

W-2 and G-1 reports on record in the RRC wellbore file, newest first. The suffix identifies the wellbore or completion event. About these reports →

SuffixFiledW-2 / G-1 dateLogs referenced
00Dec 12, 2019Nov 14, 2019Yes
00Mar 15, 2019Feb 13, 2019—
00Nov 30, 2018Sep 7, 2018Yes

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

Nearby wells and their tops

NEAREST 8 LOCATED WELLS WITH TOPS · WITHIN 16 KM

Draw a cross-section

This well's tops beside its 5 nearest neighbours, subsea-aligned so they line up regardless of surface terrain.

Open the cross-section →

Gates '05-D' Unit P42-479-43809

0.0 KM · Rosetta Resources Operating LP · Section with this well →

Escondido3,435-2,725
Olmos4,873-4,163
Austin Chalk7,783-7,073
Eagle Ford8,168-7,458
Jackson—
Edwards—
Cook Mountain—
Catahoula—

11 TOPS · FIRST 8

Gates '05-D' Unit N42-479-43807

0.0 KM · Rosetta Resources Operating LP · Section with this well →

Escondido3,436-2,725
Olmos4,860-4,149
Austin Chalk7,779-7,068
Eagle Ford8,166-7,455
Wilcox—
Jackson—
Yegua—
Edwards—

11 TOPS · FIRST 8

Gates '05-D' Unit N42-479-43806

0.0 KM · Rosetta Resources Operating LP · Section with this well →

Escondido3,437-2,725
Olmos4,862-4,150
Austin Chalk7,771-7,059
Eagle Ford8,161-7,449
Jackson—
Cook Mountain—
Queen City—
Wilcox—

11 TOPS · FIRST 8

Loma Blanca42-479-44292

3.0 KM · Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd. · Section with this well →

Jackson6904
Queen City899-205
Yegua1,098-404
Catahoula1,497-803
Wilcox1,797-1,103
Escondido2,296-1,602
Cook Mountain3,958-3,264
Olmos5,367-4,673

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Loma Blanca42-479-43732

3.5 KM · Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd. · Section with this well →

Jackson690106
Queen City899-103
Yegua1,098-302
Catahoula1,497-701
Wilcox1,797-1,001
Escondido2,296-1,500
Cook Mountain3,958-3,162
Olmos5,367-4,571

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Loma Blanca42-479-43733

3.5 KM · Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd. · Section with this well →

Jackson690106
Queen City899-103
Yegua1,098-302
Catahoula1,497-701
Wilcox1,797-1,001
Escondido2,296-1,500
Cook Mountain3,958-3,162
Olmos5,367-4,571

11 TOPS · FIRST 8

Gates 010 CHK-B 1286 W42-479-44872

3.7 KM · Chesapeake Operating, L.L.C. · Section with this well →

Jackson69019
Queen City900-191
Yegua1,100-391
Catahoula1,500-791
Wilcox1,800-1,091
Escondido3,385-2,676
Cook Mountain3,970-3,261
Olmos4,495-3,786

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Loma Blanca42-479-44289

3.7 KM · Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd. · Section with this well →

Jackson69017
Queen City899-192
Yegua1,098-391
Catahoula1,497-790
Wilcox1,797-1,090
Escondido2,296-1,589
Cook Mountain3,958-3,251
Olmos5,367-4,660

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/47943808, documented in the API reference.