WELL · 42-479-44420 · DISTRICT 4

Nido Ranch #6H

Y

Webb County · Hawkville (Austin Chalk) field · Producing  · Horizontal

Nido Ranch #6H (API 42-479-44420) is a horizontal well in Webb County operated by Killam Oil CO. Ltd., completed July 20, 2021 and listed as producing on the RRC schedule.

The RRC has issued one drilling permit (amended once), issued April 9, 2021, permitted to 14,000 ft.

It was permitted by Rio Grande E&P, LLC and has since transferred to Killam Oil CO. Ltd. on the wellbore schedule.

Completion filings report 10 formation tops, including Wilcox, Escondido, Olmos, Austin Chalk.

No lease production has been reported under this well’s leases.

Operator of record

Killam Oil Co. Ltd.

Permitted by Rio Grande E&P, LLC; the EWA schedule now lists a different operator.

Laredo, TX · P-5 Y, filed Feb 4, 2026 · 837 permits on file · (956) 724-7141

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore scheduleKillam Oil Co. Ltd.
Production reportsKillam Oil Co., Ltd.through Apr 2026
Latest permitRio Grande E&P, LLCApr 9, 2021

The sources disagree, which usually means a transfer or a lease-level production filing by a different entity. Petrora goes with the schedule.

14,000
total depth, ft
2
permits on file
Apr 9, 2021
last permit issued
Jul 20, 2021
completed
0
cumulative oil, bbl
8.81M
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS · Jul 2021 THROUGH Jul 2026

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
ON SCHEDULE
Completed
Jul 20, 2021
Shut in
—
Plugged
—

Operator's P-5 on the schedule: Active

Surface location

27.841925, -99.555459

OpenStreetMap → ·  Google Maps →

Permit surface location from the RRC GIS record, in Webb County.

Lease production

PDQ LEASE REPORTS · REPORTED THROUGH APR 2026

Texas reports oil by lease, not by well. These are the lease this well is completed on; this well is the only one on it.Why →

LeaseFieldReporting operatorWellsOil, bblGas, mcfReported
Nido Ranch G-4-291653Hawkville (Austin Chalk)Killam Oil Co., Ltd.108.81MJul 2021 – Jul 2026

Gas, mcf lease total

Last 12 months 1,196,631 · prior 12 773,016(+55%)

0100K200K202420252026

Chain of custody

Every operator that reported production on this well's lease, in order.

  1. 1Rio Grande E&P, LLCJul 2021 → May 2022
  2. 2Killam Oil Co., Ltd.Jun 2022 → Apr 2026

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
868874-98DrillRio Grande E&P, LLCSep 15, 2021Apr 9, 2021Apr 20, 202114,000
868874-99DrillRio Grande E&P, LLCApr 5, 2021Apr 9, 2021Apr 20, 202114,000

Completions

CompletedLeaseFieldOperatorStatusDepth
—— G-4-291653————

Formation tops

As filed on W-2/G-1. Subsea from 618 ft elevation.Download CSV →

FormationMD ftSubsea
WilcoxWILCOX - INJECTION/DISPOSAL4,600-3,982
EscondidoESCONDITO - INJECTION/DISPOSAL;5,629-5,011
OlmosOLMOS - INJECTION/DISPOSAL6,920-6,302
Austin Chalk10,703-10,085
CatahoulaCATAHOULA-FRIO - INJECTION/DISPO——
Cook Mountain——
Eagle FordEAGLE FORD SHALE——
JacksonJACKSON - INJECTION/DISPOSAL——
Queen CityQUEEN CITY - INJECTION/DISPOSAL;——
YeguaYEGUA - INJECTION/DISPOSAL——

Perforations

Perforated and open-hole intervals.

FromToType
11,12220,125Perforated

Casing

Strings as reported, shallowest first.

Casing inSet atHole inCement
9.6255,04912.251,800 S
5.520,1928.753,400 S

Completion filings

W-2 and G-1 reports on record in the RRC wellbore file, newest first. The suffix identifies the wellbore or completion event. About these reports →

SuffixFiledW-2 / G-1 dateLogs referenced
00Dec 20, 2021Oct 12, 2021Yes

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

Nearby wells and their tops

NEAREST 8 LOCATED WELLS WITH TOPS · WITHIN 16 KM

Draw a cross-section

This well's tops beside its 5 nearest neighbours, subsea-aligned so they line up regardless of surface terrain.

Open the cross-section →

Nido Ranch42-479-44419

0.0 KM · Rio Grande E&P, LLC · Section with this well →

Wilcox4,600-3,982
Escondido5,620-5,002
Olmos6,900-6,282
Eagle Ford11,047-10,429
Queen City—
Edwards—
Jackson—
Yegua—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Nido Ranch42-479-45196

0.0 KM · Killam Oil Co., Ltd. · Section with this well →

Wilcox4,612-3,993
Escondido5,435-4,816
Olmos6,380-5,761
Austin Chalk10,490-9,871
Eagle Ford11,042-10,423
Yegua—
Queen City—
Jackson—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Nido Ranch42-479-45086

0.0 KM · Killam Oil Co., Ltd. · Section with this well →

Wilcox4,590-3,971
Escondido5,425-4,806
Olmos6,203-5,584
Austin Chalk10,522-9,903
Eagle Ford—
Cook Mountain—
Edwards—
Queen City—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Nido Ranch42-479-45195

0.0 KM · Killam Oil Co., Ltd. · Section with this well →

Wilcox4,594-3,975
Escondido5,421-4,802
Olmos6,400-5,781
Austin Chalk10,497-9,878
Cook Mountain—
Eagle Ford—
Yegua—
Catahoula—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Nido Ranch42-479-45085

0.0 KM · Killam Oil Co., Ltd. · Section with this well →

Wilcox4,608-3,989
Escondido5,420-4,801
Olmos6,640-6,021
Austin Chalk10,520-9,901
Eagle Ford11,043-10,424
Yegua—
Catahoula—
Cook Mountain—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Nido Ranch42-479-45111

0.0 KM · Killam Oil Co., Ltd. · Section with this well →

Wilcox4,590-3,971
Escondido5,410-4,791
Olmos6,892-6,273
Austin Chalk10,540-9,921
Eagle Ford11,058-10,439
Catahoula—
Jackson—
Queen City—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Nido Ranch42-479-45194

0.0 KM · Killam Oil Co., Ltd. · Section with this well →

Wilcox4,617-3,998
Escondido5,423-4,804
Olmos6,385-5,766
Austin Chalk10,504-9,885
Cook Mountain—
Catahoula—
Yegua—
Queen City—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Nido Ranch42-479-44766

0.7 KM · Killam Oil Co., Ltd. · Section with this well →

Wilcox4,570-3,957
Escondido5,175-4,562
Olmos6,875-6,262
Austin Chalk10,381-9,768
Eagle Ford10,950-10,337
Jackson—
Queen City—
Cook Mountain—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/47944420, documented in the API reference.