WELL · 42-123-32742 · DISTRICT 2

M Gohlke Unit A #1

N

DE Witt County · Eagleville (Eagle Ford-2) field  · Horizontal

M Gohlke Unit A #1 (API 42-123-32742) is a horizontal well in De Witt County operated by Burlington Resources O & G CO LP, completed January 30, 2018.

The RRC has issued 2 drilling permits (amended once) between 2012 and 2020, permitted to 17,500 ft.

Completion filings report 9 formation tops, including Catahoula, Pecan Gap, Austin Chalk, Eagle Ford.

Its 2 leases have reported 3.46M barrels of oil and 10.1M mcf of gas since October 2012, last reporting in July 2026. The leases carry 15 wells, so these are lease totals, not this well alone.

Operator of record

Burlington Resources O & G Co LP

Based in
Houston, TX
P-5 status
Active (A)
P-5 last filed
Oct 30, 2025
Permits on file
5,130
Phone
(832) 486-2737

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore scheduleBurlington Resources O & G Co LP
Production reportsBurlington Resources O & G Co LPthrough Apr 2026
Latest permitBurlington Resources O & G Co LPNov 23, 2020
17,500
total depth, ft
3
permits on file
Nov 23, 2020
last permit issued
Jan 30, 2018
completed
3.46M
cumulative oil, bbl
10.1M
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS · Oct 2012 THROUGH Jul 2026

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
OFF SCHEDULE
Completed
Jan 30, 2018
Shut in
—
Plugged
—

Surface location

29.087225, -97.594521

Google Maps ↗

Permit surface location from the RRC GIS record, in DE Witt County.

Lease production

PDQ LEASE REPORTS · REPORTED THROUGH APR 2026

Texas reports oil by lease, not by well. These are the 2 leases this well is completed on; they carry 15 wells in total, so volumes are shared.Why →

LeaseFieldReporting operatorWellsOil, bblGas, mcfReported
M Gohlke Unit A O-2-12109DE Witt (Eagle Ford Shale)Burlington Resources O & G Co LP8595K2.21MNov 2020 – Jul 2026
M Gohlke Unit A O-2-10298Eagleville (Eagle Ford-2)Burlington Resources O & G Co LP72.87M7.86MOct 2012 – Feb 2021

Oil, barrels lease total

Last 12 months 43,387 · prior 12 70,184(-38%)

05K10K202420252026

Gas, mcf lease total

Last 12 months 186,987 · prior 12 252,698(-26%)

020K40K202420252026

Chain of custody

Every operator that reported production on this well's lease, in order.

  1. 1Burlington Resources O & G Co LPDec 2012 → Apr 2026

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
866164-99Field transferBurlington Resources O & G Co LPNov 19, 2020Nov 23, 2020Nov 10, 202017,500
736625-98DrillBurlington Resources O & G Co LPMay 10, 2012Apr 5, 2012Oct 15, 201212,800
736625-99DrillBurlington Resources O & G Co LPMar 22, 2012Apr 5, 2012Sep 20, 201212,800

Completions

CompletedLeaseFieldOperatorStatusDepth
—— O-2-10298————
—— O-2-12109————

Formation tops

As filed on W-2/G-1. Subsea from 452 ft elevation.Download CSV →

FormationMD ftSubsea
Catahoula11,894-11,442
Pecan Gap11,894-11,442
Austin Chalk12,106-11,654
Eagle Ford12,490-12,038
Catahoula——
EdwardsEDWARDS - H2S——
Frio——
Vicksburg——
Wilcox——
Yegua——

Perforations

Perforated and open-hole intervals.

FromToType
13,15417,323Perforated

Casing

Strings as reported, shallowest first.

Casing inSet atHole inCement
9.6253,67312.251,090 S
5.517,4688.751,780 S

Completion filings

W-2 and G-1 reports on record in the RRC wellbore file, newest first. The suffix identifies the wellbore or completion event. About these reports →

SuffixFiledW-2 / G-1 dateLogs referenced
00Feb 8, 2021Jan 26, 2021—
00Jun 22, 2018Apr 11, 2018—
00May 15, 2014Apr 2, 2014—
00Mar 22, 2013Jan 16, 2013—
00Feb 25, 2013Dec 5, 2012Yes

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

Nearby wells and their tops

NEAREST 8 LOCATED WELLS WITH TOPS · WITHIN 16 KM

Draw a cross-section

This well's tops beside its 5 nearest neighbors, subsea-aligned so they line up regardless of surface terrain.

Open the cross-section →

Turbo Unit A42-123-34872

0.5 KM · Burlington Resources O & G Co LP · Section with this well →

Yegua2,447-1,994
Wilcox5,461-5,008
Austin Chalk12,143-11,690
Eagle Ford12,492-12,039
Catahoula—
Vicksburg—
Frio—
Edwards—

Turbo Unit A42-123-34867

0.5 KM · Burlington Resources O & G Co LP · Section with this well →

Yegua2,448-1,994
Wilcox5,457-5,003
Austin Chalk12,136-11,682
Eagle Ford12,497-12,043
Vicksburg—
Frio—
Edwards—
Catahoula—

Turbo Unit A42-123-34868

0.5 KM · Burlington Resources O & G Co LP · Section with this well →

Yegua2,453-1,998
Wilcox5,454-4,999
Austin Chalk12,133-11,678
Eagle Ford12,488-12,033
Edwards—
Catahoula—
Vicksburg—
Frio—

Turbo Unit A42-123-34869

0.5 KM · Burlington Resources O & G Co LP · Section with this well →

Yegua2,449-1,994
Wilcox5,465-5,010
Austin Chalk12,150-11,695
Eagle Ford12,487-12,032
Vicksburg—
Frio—
Edwards—
Catahoula—

Turbo Unit A42-123-34870

0.5 KM · Burlington Resources O & G Co LP · Section with this well →

Yegua2,449-1,993
Wilcox5,461-5,005
Austin Chalk12,135-11,679
Eagle Ford12,495-12,039
Catahoula—
Edwards—
Vicksburg—
Frio—

Turbo Unit A42-123-34871

0.5 KM · Burlington Resources O & G Co LP · Section with this well →

Yegua2,452-1,995
Wilcox5,456-4,999
Austin Chalk12,132-11,675
Eagle Ford12,480-12,023
Vicksburg—
Catahoula—
Edwards—
Frio—

M Gohlke Unit A42-123-34319

0.5 KM · Burlington Resources O & G Co LP · Section with this well →

Frio1,018-568
Vicksburg1,584-1,134
Yegua2,478-2,028
Wilcox5,527-5,077
Austin Chalk12,242-11,792
Eagle Ford12,607-12,157
Catahoula—
Edwards—

M Gohlke Unit A42-123-34320

0.5 KM · Burlington Resources O & G Co LP · Section with this well →

Frio1,018-592
Vicksburg1,586-1,160
Yegua2,478-2,052
Wilcox5,523-5,097
Austin Chalk12,212-11,786
Eagle Ford12,601-12,175
Edwards—
Catahoula—

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/12332742, documented in the API reference.