TEXAS · WELLS · MAVERICK COUNTY · LA PALOMA LEASE · API 42-323-32471 · DISTRICT 01
La Paloma #384
Maverick County · Chittim (Georgetown) field · Vertical
La Paloma #384 (API 42-323-32471) is a plugged well in Maverick County, plugged December 16, 2014, last operated by Newfield Exploration Company.
The RRC has issued one drilling permit (amended once), issued July 14, 1994, permitted to 3,000 ft.
It was permitted by Prime Operating Company and has since transferred to Newfield Exploration Company on the wellbore schedule.
Completion filings report 2 formation tops, including Buda, Georgetown.
Operator of record
Permitted by Prime Operating Company; the EWA schedule now lists a different operator.
- Based in
- The Woodlands, TX
- P-5 status
- Delinquent (D)
- P-5 last filed
- Sep 2, 2022
- Permits on file
- 821
- Phone
- (281) 210-5100
SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE
What each RRC source says
| Wellbore schedule | Newfield Exploration Company |
| Production reports | Exploration Company, Thethrough May 1999 |
| Latest permit | Prime Operating CompanyJul 14, 1994 |
The sources disagree, which usually means a transfer or a lease-level production filing by a different entity. Petrora goes with the schedule.
- 3,000
- total depth, ft
- 2
- permits on file
- Jul 14, 1994
- last permit issued
- Jul 27, 1994
- completed
- 0
- cumulative oil, bbl
- 593
- cumulative gas, mcf
PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS · Jul 1994 THROUGH Dec 2014
Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file
- Schedule
- OFF SCHEDULE
- Completed
- Jul 27, 1994
- Shut in
- —
- Plugged
- Dec 16, 2014
Surface location
No coordinates on the permit record yet. The RRC's GIS record usually lands within days of issuance; historical master-file permits never carry one.
Lease production
PDQ LEASE REPORTS · REPORTED THROUGH APR 2026
Texas reports oil by lease, not by well. These are the lease this well is completed on; this well is the only one on it.Why →
| Lease | Field | Reporting operator | Wells | Oil, bbl | Gas, mcf | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| La Paloma G-1-151561 | Chittim (Georgetown) | Newfield Exploration Company | 1 | 0 | 593 | Jul 1994 – Dec 2014 |
No volumes reported on these leases in the last three years.
Chain of custody
Every operator that reported production on this well's lease, in order.
- 1Exploration Company, TheJan 1999 → May 1999
Permits
| Permit | Type | Operator | Received | Issued | Spud | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 425891-98 | Drill | Prime Operating Company | Aug 22, 1994 | Jul 14, 1994 | — | 3,000 |
| 425891-99 | Drill | Prime Operating Company | Jul 14, 1994 | Jul 14, 1994 | Jul 20, 1994 | 3,000 |
Completions
| Completed | Lease | Field | Operator | Status | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 1994 | La Paloma G-1-151561 | Chittim (Georgetown) | Newfield Exploration Company | Plugged | — |
Perforations
Perforated and open-hole intervals.
| From | To | Type |
|---|---|---|
| 2,601 | 2,802 | Perforated |
Casing
Strings as reported, shallowest first.
| Casing in | Set at | Hole in | Cement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.625 | 272 | 12.25 | 155 S |
| 4.5 | 2,601 | 7.875 | 200 S |
Completion filings
W-2 and G-1 reports on record in the RRC wellbore file, newest first. The suffix identifies the wellbore or completion event. About these reports →
| Suffix | Filed | W-2 / G-1 date | Logs referenced |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00 | Dec 1, 1994 | Sep 19, 1994 | Yes |
| 00 | Nov 4, 1994 | — | — |
The source documents
Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.
- Wellbore filings for 42-323-32471 → W-2, G-1, plugging reports, as PDFs
- Completion packets for 42-323-32471 → scanned completion filings
Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.
About this data
Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.
New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease
Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/32332471, documented in the API reference.