TEXAS · WELLS · NACOGDOCHES COUNTY · TRAWICK GU 22 LEASE · API 42-347-31629 · DISTRICT 06

Trawick GU 22 #5

Plugged

Nacogdoches County · Trawick (Pettit-TP Cons.) field  · Vertical

Trawick GU 22 #5 (API 42-347-31629) is a plugged well in Nacogdoches County, plugged January 20, 2023, last operated by Xto Energy Inc..

The RRC has issued one drilling permit, issued February 20, 1996, permitted to 9,000 ft.

It was permitted by Exxon Corp. and has since transferred to Xto Energy Inc. on the wellbore schedule.

Completion filings report 6 formation tops, including Rodessa, James Lime, Pine Island, Pettit.

Its lease has reported 752K mcf of gas since September 1996, with no volume in the three years through April 2026.

Operator of record

XTO Energy Inc.

Permitted by Exxon Corp.; the EWA schedule now lists a different operator.

Based in
Spring, TX
P-5 status
Active – Extension (X)
P-5 last filed
Apr 8, 2026
Permits on file
16,156
Phone
(346) 502-1572

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore scheduleXTO Energy Inc.
Production reportsXTO Energy Inc.through Jan 2018
Latest permitExxon Corp.Feb 20, 1996

The sources disagree, which usually means a transfer or a lease-level production filing by a different entity. Petrora goes with the schedule.

9,000
total depth, ft
1
permits on file
Feb 20, 1996
last permit issued
Sep 25, 1996
completed
0
cumulative oil, bbl
752K
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS · Sep 1996 THROUGH Jan 2018

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
OFF SCHEDULE
Completed
Sep 25, 1996
Shut in
—
Plugged
Jan 20, 2023

Surface location

No coordinates on the permit record yet. The RRC's GIS record usually lands within days of issuance; historical master-file permits never carry one.

Lease production

PDQ LEASE REPORTS · REPORTED THROUGH APR 2026

Texas reports oil by lease, not by well. These are the lease this well is completed on; this well is the only one on it.Why →

LeaseFieldReporting operatorWellsOil, bblGas, mcfReported
Trawick GU 22 G-6-160764Trawick (Pettit-TP Cons.)XTO Energy Inc.10752KSep 1996 – Jan 2018

No volumes reported on these leases in the last three years.

Chain of custody

Every operator that reported production on this well's lease, in order.

  1. 1Exxon Corp.Sep 1996 → Mar 2000
  2. 2Exxon Mobil CorporationApr 2000 → Dec 2013
  3. 3XTO Energy Inc.Jan 2014 → Jan 2018

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
444946-99DrillExxon Corp.Feb 20, 1996Feb 20, 1996Jun 17, 19969,000

Completions

CompletedLeaseFieldOperatorStatusDepth
Sep 25, 1996Trawick GU 22 G-6-160764Trawick (Pettit-TP Cons.)XTO Energy Inc.Plugged—

Formation tops

As filed on W-2/G-1. Subsea from 19 ft elevation.Download CSV →

FormationMD ftSubsea
Rodessa6,840-6,821
James LimeJAMES7,316-7,297
Pine Island7,456-7,437
Pettit7,562-7,543
Transition Zone7,947-7,928
Travis Peak8,874-8,855

Perforations

Perforated and open-hole intervals.

FromToType
8,1558,244Perforated
8,3248,416Perforated
8,4328,438Perforated
8,4768,480Perforated
8,7178,727Perforated
8,7368,740Perforated

Casing

Strings as reported, shallowest first.

Casing inSet atHole inCement
8.6251,36711430 S
5.59,0067.8751,100 S

Completion filings

W-2 and G-1 reports on record in the RRC wellbore file, newest first. The suffix identifies the wellbore or completion event. The record date is the RRC's own date on the record, not the day the report was filed: 462,034 of the state's filings carry 1984-01-12. About these reports →

SuffixRRC record dateW-2 / G-1 dateLogs referenced
00Dec 12, 1996Oct 10, 1996Yes
00Dec 10, 1996——

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images filed since 2004 open from the RRC's log search for this well; none are loaded here for it.

Find logs withinmiles of this well:List →Map →

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/34731629, documented in the API reference.