WELL · 42-423-32424 · DISTRICT 6

Black Fork Creek Unit #1

Plugged

Smith County · Wildcat field  · Vertical

Black Fork Creek Unit #1 (API 42-423-32424) is a plugged well in Smith County, plugged December 28, 2018, last operated by 3-T Exploration Inc..

The RRC has issued one drilling permit, issued November 2, 2018, permitted to 8,200 ft.

It was permitted by 3-T Exploration, Inc. and has since transferred to 3-T Exploration Inc. on the wellbore schedule.

Operator of record

3-T Exploration Inc.

Permitted by 3-T Exploration, Inc.; the EWA schedule now lists a different operator.

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore schedulenone
Production reportsnone
Latest permit3-T Exploration, Inc.Nov 2, 2018

The sources disagree, which usually means a transfer or a lease-level production filing by a different entity. Petrora goes with the schedule.

8,200
total depth, ft
1
permits on file
Nov 2, 2018
last permit issued
—
completed
—
cumulative oil, bbl
—
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
OFF SCHEDULE
Completed
—
Shut in
—
Plugged
Dec 28, 2018

Surface location

32.384172, -95.394312

OpenStreetMap → ·  Google Maps →

Permit surface location from the RRC GIS record, in Smith County.

Only the permit record exists for this well so far, here and in the RRC's wellbore query. Completion reports, formation tops, lease production, and the scanned filings appear once the operator files a completion report, typically months after drilling. Petrora refreshes the wellbore file weekly, so a filing from the last few days may reach the RRC before it shows here. How long each source takes →

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
846432-99Drill3-T Exploration, Inc.Nov 2, 2018Nov 2, 2018Dec 13, 20188,200

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

Nearby wells and their tops

NEAREST 8 LOCATED WELLS WITH TOPS · WITHIN 16 KM

Draw a cross-section

This well has no tops filed, so it cannot anchor a section; its neighbours can.

Section of the neighbours →

West Tyler (Paluxy Bankhead)42-423-32467

0.6 KM · Weathers Exploration, Inc. · Section with this well →

Nacatoch2,846-2,392
Woodbine5,409-4,955
Paluxy7,866-7,412
Pettit—
Cotton Valley—
Travis Peak—
Rodessa—

West Tyler (Paluxy Bankhead)42-423-32452

1.0 KM · Weathers Exploration, Inc. · Section with this well →

Nacatoch2,814-2,350
Woodbine5,405-4,941
Paluxy7,665-7,201
Rodessa—
Cotton Valley—
Travis Peak—
Pettit—

Newton, William F.42-423-31345

5.1 KM · Maximus Operating, Ltd. · Section with this well →

Salt920-482
Rodessa10,555-10,117
Travis Peak10,800-10,362

Bradie O Hopper42-423-32435

6.5 KM · Maximus Operating, Ltd. · Section with this well →

Base of Salt8,440-7,999
Goodland8,518-8,077
Paluxy8,676-8,235
Glen Rose9,085-8,644
Travis Peak—
Cotton Valley—
Rodessa—
Woodbine—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

Wilson, Janet et AL42-213-31039

6.9 KM · Maximus Operating, Ltd. · Section with this well →

B. Austin Chalk4,850-4,475
Austin Chalk4,850-4,475
T Woodbine5,300-4,925
Woodbine5,300-4,925
T Buda6,240-5,865
T Goodland Lime7,684-7,309
T Paluxy7,800-7,425
Paluxy7,800-7,425

9 TOPS · FIRST 8

Covington42-423-32399

7.2 KM · Chesapeake Operating, L.L.C. · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,754-3,307
Woodbine6,115-5,668
Goodland8,780-8,333
Paluxy8,932-8,485
Cotton Valley—
Pettit—
Rodessa—
Travis Peak—

Antony42-423-32465

10.1 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,139-2,667
Woodbine5,935-5,463
Goodland8,706-8,234
Paluxy8,706-8,234
Pettit—
Cotton Valley—
Rodessa—
Travis Peak—

Cleo42-423-32466

10.1 KM · Valence Operating Company · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,153-2,681
Woodbine5,949-5,477
Goodland8,702-8,230
Paluxy8,702-8,230
Cotton Valley—
Travis Peak—
Rodessa—
Pettit—

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/42332424, documented in the API reference.