WELL · 42-423-32447 · DISTRICT 6

Perdue #1

Plugged

Smith County · Wildcat field  · Directional

Perdue #1 (API 42-423-32447) is a plugged well in Smith County, plugged July 17, 2021, last operated by Strand Energy L.C..

The RRC has issued one drilling permit, issued May 5, 2021, permitted to 9,900 ft.

It was permitted by Strand Energy, L.C. and has since transferred to Strand Energy L.C. on the wellbore schedule.

Operator of record

Strand Energy L.C.

Permitted by Strand Energy, L.C.; the EWA schedule now lists a different operator.

SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE

What each RRC source says

Wellbore schedulenone
Production reportsnone
Latest permitStrand Energy, L.C.May 5, 2021

The sources disagree, which usually means a transfer or a lease-level production filing by a different entity. Petrora goes with the schedule.

9,900
total depth, ft
1
permits on file
May 5, 2021
last permit issued
—
completed
—
cumulative oil, bbl
—
cumulative gas, mcf

PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS

Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file

Schedule
OFF SCHEDULE
Completed
—
Shut in
—
Plugged
Jul 17, 2021

Surface location

32.448878, -95.466446

OpenStreetMap → ·  Google Maps →

Permit surface location from the RRC GIS record, in Smith County.

Only the permit record exists for this well so far, here and in the RRC's wellbore query. Completion reports, formation tops, lease production, and the scanned filings appear once the operator files a completion report, typically months after drilling. Petrora refreshes the wellbore file weekly, so a filing from the last few days may reach the RRC before it shows here. How long each source takes →

Permits

PermitTypeOperatorReceivedIssuedSpudDepth
869425-99DrillStrand Energy, L.C.Apr 26, 2021May 5, 2021Jul 2, 20219,900

The source documents

Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.

Log images are in archives with no per-well link: the RRC's Neubus archive (2004 onward). then paste it into their search.

Nearby wells and their tops

NEAREST 8 LOCATED WELLS WITH TOPS · WITHIN 16 KM

Draw a cross-section

This well has no tops filed, so it cannot anchor a section; its neighbours can.

Section of the neighbours →

Covington42-423-32399

2.7 KM · Chesapeake Operating, L.L.C. · Section with this well →

Nacatoch3,754-3,307
Woodbine6,115-5,668
Goodland8,780-8,333
Paluxy8,932-8,485
Travis Peak—
Rodessa—
Pettit—
Cotton Valley—

Newton, William F.42-423-31345

5.4 KM · Maximus Operating, Ltd. · Section with this well →

Salt920-482
Rodessa10,555-10,117
Travis Peak10,800-10,362

Bradie O Hopper42-423-32435

5.9 KM · Maximus Operating, Ltd. · Section with this well →

Base of Salt8,440-7,999
Goodland8,518-8,077
Paluxy8,676-8,235
Glen Rose9,085-8,644
Rodessa—
Travis Peak—
Nacatoch—
Pettit—

10 TOPS · FIRST 8

West Tyler (Paluxy Bankhead)42-423-32467

9.4 KM · Weathers Exploration, Inc. · Section with this well →

Nacatoch2,846-2,392
Woodbine5,409-4,955
Paluxy7,866-7,412
Travis Peak—
Rodessa—
Cotton Valley—
Pettit—

West Tyler (Paluxy Bankhead)42-423-32452

10.4 KM · Weathers Exploration, Inc. · Section with this well →

Nacatoch2,814-2,350
Woodbine5,405-4,941
Paluxy7,665-7,201
Pettit—
Rodessa—
Travis Peak—
Cotton Valley—

Wilson, Janet et AL42-213-31039

10.8 KM · Maximus Operating, Ltd. · Section with this well →

Austin Chalk4,850-4,475
B. Austin Chalk4,850-4,475
Woodbine5,300-4,925
T Woodbine5,300-4,925
T Buda6,240-5,865
T Goodland Lime7,684-7,309
Paluxy7,800-7,425
T Paluxy7,800-7,425

9 TOPS · FIRST 8

Bogue Estate42-467-31174

12.0 KM · Tana Exploration Company LLC · Section with this well →

Nacatoch2,000-1,974
Pecan Gap2,200-2,174
Austin Chalk3,800-3,774
Sub-Clarksville4,150-4,124
Woodbine4,400-4,374
Paluxy6,470-6,444
Rodessa7,820-7,794
Smackover—

Fleming42-423-30600

13.9 KM · Strand Energy, L.C. · Section with this well →

Austin Chalk4,763-4,350
Woodbine5,463-5,050
Pettit9,955-9,542
Travis Peak10,121-9,708

About this data

Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.

New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease

Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/42332447, documented in the API reference.