TEXAS · WELLS · ECTOR COUNTY · PARKER MINERALS 11 LEASE · API 42-135-40348 · DISTRICT 7B
Parker Minerals 11 #25
Ector County · Goldsmith (Clear Fork) field · Producing · Vertical
Parker Minerals 11 #25 (API 42-135-40348) is a well in Ector County operated by Acoma Operating LLC, completed August 1, 2010 and listed as producing on the RRC schedule.
The RRC has issued 2 drilling permits between 2010 and 2013, permitted to 6,055 ft.
It was permitted by Sheridan Production Company, LLC and has since transferred to Acoma Operating LLC on the wellbore schedule.
Completion filings report 6 formation tops, including Yates, Queen, Grayburg, San Andres.
Its lease has reported 670K barrels of oil and 1.52M mcf of gas since June 2007, last reporting volume in April 2026. The lease carries 32 wells, so these are lease totals, not this well alone.
Operator of record
Permitted by Sheridan Production Company, LLC; the EWA schedule now lists a different operator.
- Based in
- Lubbock, TX
- P-5 status
- Active (A)
- P-5 last filed
- Sep 3, 2025
- Permits on file
- 9
- Phone
- (806) 507-9070
SOURCE · RRC EWA WELLBORE SCHEDULE
What each RRC source says
| Wellbore schedule | Acoma Operating LLC |
| Production reports | Acoma Operating, LLCthrough Apr 2026 |
| Latest permit | Sheridan Production Company, LLCMay 16, 2013 |
The sources disagree, which usually means a transfer or a lease-level production filing by a different entity. Petrora goes with the schedule.
- 6,055
- total depth, ft
- 2
- permits on file
- May 16, 2013
- last permit issued
- Aug 1, 2010
- completed
- 670K
- cumulative oil, bbl
- 1.52M
- cumulative gas, mcf
PRODUCTION FROM PDQ LEASE REPORTS · Jul 2007 THROUGH Apr 2026
Regulatory status · RRC wellbore file
- Schedule
- ON SCHEDULE
- Completed
- Aug 1, 2010
- Shut in
- —
- Plugged
- —
Operator's P-5 on the schedule: Active – Extension (X)
Surface location
No coordinates on the permit record yet. The RRC's GIS record usually lands within days of issuance; historical master-file permits never carry one.
Lease production
PDQ LEASE REPORTS · REPORTED THROUGH APR 2026
Texas reports oil by lease, not by well. These are the lease this well is completed on; they carry 32 wells in total, so volumes are shared.Why →
| Lease | Field | Reporting operator | Wells | Oil, bbl | Gas, mcf | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parker Minerals 11 O-10-38625 | Goldsmith (Clear Fork) | Acoma Operating, LLC | 32 | 670K | 1.52M | Jun 2007 – Apr 2026 |
Oil, barrels lease total
Last 12 months 811 · prior 12 821(-1%)
Gas, mcf lease total
Last 12 months 2,845 · prior 12 1,723(+65%)
Chain of custody
Every operator that reported production on this well's lease, in order.
- 1Sandridge Expl. and Prod., LLCJul 2007 → Jan 2013
- 2Sheridan Production Company, LLCFeb 2013 → Mar 2020
- 3FDL Operating, LLCApr 2020 → Nov 2021
- 4Contango Resources, Inc.Dec 2021 → Dec 2021
- 5Contango Resources, LLCJan 2022 → Aug 2023
- 6Acoma Operating, LLCSep 2023 → Apr 2026
Permits
| Permit | Type | Operator | Received | Issued | Spud | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 762580-99 | Recompletion | Sheridan Production Company, LLC | May 13, 2013 | May 16, 2013 | — | 6,055 |
| 695782-99 | Drill | Sandridge Expl. and Prod., LLC | May 11, 2010 | May 12, 2010 | Jun 29, 2010 | 12,000 |
Completions
| Completed | Lease | Field | Operator | Status | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2010 | Parker Minerals 11 O-10-38625 | Goldsmith (Clear Fork) | Acoma Operating LLC | Producing | 6,055 |
Formation tops
As filed on W-2/G-1. Subsea from 3,157 ft elevation.Download CSV →
| Formation | MD ft | Subsea |
|---|---|---|
| Yates | 2,737 | 420 |
| Queen | 3,652 | -495 |
| Grayburg | 3,998 | -841 |
| San Andres | 4,204 | -1,047 |
| Glorieta | 4,883 | -1,726 |
| Clear Fork | 5,324 | -2,167 |
Perforations
Perforated and open-hole intervals.
| From | To | Type |
|---|---|---|
| 5,626 | 5,774 | Perforated |
Casing
Strings as reported, shallowest first.
| Casing in | Set at | Hole in | Cement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.625 | 1,387 | 12.25 | 700 S |
| 5.5 | 6,055 | 7.875 | 320 S |
Completion filings
W-2 and G-1 reports on record in the RRC wellbore file, newest first. The suffix identifies the wellbore or completion event. The record date is the RRC's own date on the record, not the day the report was filed: 462,034 of the state's filings carry 1984-01-12. About these reports →
| Suffix | RRC record date | W-2 / G-1 date | Logs referenced |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00 | Apr 4, 2011 | Sep 3, 2010 | Yes |
Well logs
1 log loaded from the RRC's log index, the latest received Aug 2, 2013. Resistivity. These are the logs loaded into Petrora from the Railroad Commission's inventories, not necessarily every log run on the well. The RRC holds the files; each opens from its log search for the well. The kind is the RRC's description of the log; the interval is the one filed for it.
Open the RRC's log search for this well ↗| Logas described | Files | Intervalft, as filed | Datereceived | SizeMB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RESISTIVITYSpans Yates, Queen, Grayburg, San Andres, Glorieta, Clear Fork | TIFF | 1,382 to 6,047 | Aug 2, 2013run Jul 7, 2010 | 4.09 |
"Spans" is by this well's own filed formation tops: a formation runs from its top to the next deeper top filed, and the deepest runs to the bottom of the log. Depths are measured along the wellbore, so on a horizontal the lateral counts in the formation it was landed in.
The source documents
Petrora holds the structured record. The scanned filings live at the RRC; these links open its search already filled in for this API.
- Wellbore filings for 42-135-40348 → W-2, G-1, plugging reports, as PDFs
- Completion packets for 42-135-40348 → scanned completion filings
The logs loaded for this well are under Well logs, with the RRC's log search for it. The University Lands library has no per-well link: then paste it into its search.
About this data
Permits from the RRC OGA049M master and daily daf420 files; wellbore and operator of record from the EWA schedule, weekly; completions, formation tops, casing, and perforations from the dbf900 wellbore file; production from PDQ lease reports, which lag two to three months; injection from UIC permits, H-10 reports, and TexNet daily volumes; earthquakes from the TexNet catalog.
New to these records? How to read a well page · API numbers · completion reports and tops · why production is by lease
Developers: this page as JSON is GET /v1/data/wells/13540348, documented in the API reference.